Health
A product could be created to provide insight into better living.
Health through embedded systems? A fridge? That’s too obvious, even though it’s theoretically close to the source of all things health (nutrition), it is far too complex to configure and maintain (at least from my perception, at this moment).
What of a companion? No, not a waifu bot with an embedded fleshlight, but something more wholesome, or at least less degenerative.
The bot, from the JBP line, doesn’t just clean you room. No, it senses things which affect health and wellbeing -> detects food, sounds which are evidence of particular activities.
Activities |
Better than our well known competitors, this JBP class bot interacts in the same environment -> can fetch things and take on physical tasks, such as organizing, understanding object types and locations, checking time used for certain operations, evaluating predicatibility to suggest more structured routine to the organism.
What Elon did for Transportation, we might as well do for the home. Of course, compared to the neuralink, we need to preserve privacy and, perhaps, make it better valued. We don’t just oblige tendencies towards gratification, and we’re not an inquisition, we show the methods of a type of organized, structured life whose balance can be conducive to “happiness”.
Should humans seek the technological transcendence of being? What is the #1 benefit? Time?
Can there be more time through other optimizations (age old question)?
The life experience likely cannot be digitized. We aim to remove the noise of new rich methods of computation -> we aim to do this through computation perfection, but it is likely that this cannot be accomplished, as it is something emergent along with emergent matter from existence.
Time -> matter is the echo of there having been time.
Matter is an emergent artifact to express the differential of time.
There is no recording of time without matter. Time itself is perhaps fundamental to existence, or it is an abstraction or complexity to be perceived of existence. Otherwise, might there be absolute unity? Or is there still a type of duality? Duality with what?
God and Not God?
Self and Other?
Experienced and not experienced?
All possibilities at once?
Good and Evil?
Are these human -> is suffering only known because of humanity? No, all beings appear to suffer, though it might be a simulation. In which case, does the self truly suffer?
Why simulate suffering? For wisdom? For Strength? Strength for What?
Strength to endure a more difficult simulation?
If there were to be simulations, might the participants have choice? Why not have choice if there is any power to simulate?